1. Let us consider again an excerpt from the nesting painting:
| A | B | C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child 1 | Child 2 | Parent | ||
| 2 | Turnover | 500 | 400 | 900 |
| 3 | Direct costs | 300 | 240 | {540 |
| 4 | Direct margin | 200 | 160 | {360 |
| 8 | Common costs | 340 | ||
| 9 | Direct margin (C4 – C8) | 20 |
When, in such a table, the parent enterprise is legal-entity enterprise then over the period considered:
2. Costs common to sister margin-producing sections are direct cost components of the sisters' parent.
The full wages of the management of a (parent) margin producing department by several departments (children) are:
Costs that are common at one level become direct at a more aggregated level. Conversely, costs that are direct at one level become common at a less aggregated level.
3. Overhead costs are common.
This is particularly clear when the copy of the painting in question is the one in which the parent is the contractual undertaking. Consider the case of an enterprise such as:
4. In forecasting management and unit cost calculations, common costs raise the problem of their distribution.
All along a chain of nested tables, from the one where the parent is the contract enterprise to one where the children are products sold by the contract enterprise, common costs are to be distributed in a cascade. At the end of the chain where the parent enterprise is the contract enterprise, the latter's profit, i.e. its direct margin, is to be divided with the common costs. In the end, these successive allocations can amount to more than 80 or 90 % of the selling prices excluding VAT of part or even the entire range, with a significant effect on competitiveness for the reasons that we will examine in the rest of this chapter.